I’m walking through the fancy Olympic-built Beijing airport
and Julia Roberts is smiling at me, enticing me to buy some fancy French
perfume. Heading to the gate, Tchaikovsky is serenading me with The Nutcracker
Suite. I can’t help but wonder why I don’t hear Chinese Opera playing in
Chicago airport as I pass photos of Diana Xu, the current Ms. Universe contestant from China, selling me ginseng.
Of course, I don’t really wonder. I know enough of the ways
of the world to know how those with the big shoulders of power and money take
up more than their share of room. And interestingly enough, so much of it comes
down to alphabetic literacy.
A decade or so ago, I had a private festival of reading
about the advent of literacy in general and the Western phonetic alphabet in
particular. Preface to Plato, Orality and Literacy, The Singer
of Tales, A Is for Ox, The Spell of the Sensuous, The
Gutenberg Galaxy are just some of the books I can recall without looking
them up. The latter, written by Marshall McCluhan a half-century or so ago,
touches directly on this matter:
•"The phonetic alphabet diminishes the role of the
other senses of sound and touch and taste… it creates a sudden breach between the auditory and visual experience
of man. Only the phonetic alphabet makes such a sharp division in experience,
giving to its user an eye for an ear, and freeing him from the tribal trance of
resonating word and magic and the web of kinship."
•"...from the invention of the alphabet there has
been a continuous drive in the Western world toward the separation of the
senses, of functions, of operations, of states emotional and political, as well
as of tasks..."
• "Only alphabetic cultures have ever mastered
connected lineal sequences as pervasive forms of psychic and social
organization. The breaking up of every kind of experience into uniform units in
order to produce faster action and change of form (applied knowledge) has been
the secret of Western power over man and nature alike."
• "The alphabet is an aggressive and militant
absorber and transformer of cultures...any society possesing the alphabet can
translate any adjacent culture into its alphabetic mode. But this is a one-way
process. No non-alphabetic culture can take over an alphabetic one; because the
alphabet cannot be assimilated; it can only liquidate or reduce.”
Because my daily bread is buttered with “resonate words and
tones and magic and forming a web of kinship,” these insights are of great
interest to me. I work with—and take delight in— oral learners called
preschoolers, get newspaper-reading screen-addicted adults to slap their
bodies, vocalize grunts and make eye contact with their neighbors while dancing
in body-beating bliss. I see how my music teacher tribe members are fighting,
and often losing, a battle with the t-crossers and i-dotters who insist that we
deal only in the coin of uniform units producing predictable results that can
be measured by machines. The lineal sequences of efficient factories still
dominate school cultures, the breaking up of every kind of experience into the
fiction of school subjects run by clocks and timetables transforms the freedoms
and freewheeling imaginations of childhood to the humdrum world of class
schedules. I know—and have to accept as a trade-off for hotel
reservations, running water and terrorism protection—that a man in a uniform in
Passport Control has the power to make my life miserable if a single paper is
missing, but I have no power or invitation to make his life joyful by teaching
him some music.
Not that I entirely object to linear organization. (This
particular blog entry certainly could use some.)
I think I’m finally over my naivete about local tribal culture steeped in oral tradition as the model par excellence for human culture. I still find much to recommend it, but when conservative traditions from clitorectomies to widow-burning continue unopposed because no one has encountered the kind of alternative viewpoints that reading can provide, it reveals that not only is the return to tribal culture impossible once Starbucks has moved in, but not wholly desirable. What is desirable, and what I aim for in my teaching and educational vision, is the personal and collective re-balancing of the senses, the kind of thing I touched on in a long-ago blog titled “Dance, Sing and Read.”
I think I’m finally over my naivete about local tribal culture steeped in oral tradition as the model par excellence for human culture. I still find much to recommend it, but when conservative traditions from clitorectomies to widow-burning continue unopposed because no one has encountered the kind of alternative viewpoints that reading can provide, it reveals that not only is the return to tribal culture impossible once Starbucks has moved in, but not wholly desirable. What is desirable, and what I aim for in my teaching and educational vision, is the personal and collective re-balancing of the senses, the kind of thing I touched on in a long-ago blog titled “Dance, Sing and Read.”
So I hoped this has helped the patient reader understand why
they’re unlikely to encounter Chinese opera over the loudspeakers in Chicago
Airport and why Julia Roberts is following me everywhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.