Yesterday, I posted this on Facebook:
Two
hours before the joyful performance of 46 kids of our Middle School kids, I
heard the news about Paris. We had worked 8 long weeks on the side of life and
love and creation of beauty, of feeling power through beauty and music, while
teenagers elsewhere had planned horrific and heartless destruction, feeling
power through the barrel of a gun. The contrast was stunning. And less we
dismiss it too easily as crazed fanatics, those people were kids who nobody
took time to love and nurture and care for and give them the life-loving
opportunities they deserved. Alongside the grief, let's re-double efforts to
care for our children and work tirelessly for social justice, each from our
little corner of creation. Recommit ourselves to life and love and light.
That's the only response I can imagine in our age of terror, at home (school
shootings) and abroad. Feeling the unimaginable grief of the victim's families,
I felt our kids singing on their behalf, bringing our little flame of light
into the darkness.
One of my friends (Facebook and in real life)
responded:
Beautiful,
Doug, but I would think that the attackers' families DO love and teach them,
but the polar opposite of what we saw w your students last night.
And that got me
thinking, “Could that really be true? Can a parent who teaches a child to hate
the other actually feel genuine love for that child? Is that an adequate
definition of love?”
I suppose it could be so on some level. I grew up with
uncles and aunts who seemed to care for me, but had narrow-minded prejudices
about various ethnic groups. But they never taught me to actively hate them and
certainly never suggested I should kill them.
At any rate, no reason to split hairs about what true
love is. The real issue is cultivating a love and sense of belonging that
includes all the others, of widening the circle of who we are taught to belong
to. And that includes going beyond people as well to four-legged creatures and
further yet to plants and rivers and mountains. The evolution of social justice
is precisely that widening circle. In American history, people came to accept
religious rights and women’s rights and then racial equality and then gay and
lesbian rights. Of course, by no means all people, but if you just look at
legislation, going from women’s suffrage to civil rights to gay marriage, there
is a clear progression of what people are willing to accept. I’d like to think
it’s a steadily ascending line, but it does seem to often take ten steps
backwards.
At any rate, starting with MAD (mutually assured
destruction in the nuclear arms race) and now to climate change and terrorism,
we simply don’t have the luxury to wait. We desperately need to cultivate an
inclusive love. Don’t you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.