I didn’t love school as a kid and it didn’t love
me. And here I’ve dedicated my whole life to teaching in a school. Go figure.
But it makes perfect sense. Ever since reading
John Holt’s How Children Fail in my junior year of high school, it
occurred to me that schools could be better than they are. And I was blessed to
fall into a school dedicated precisely to that mission. 43 years after I
arrived at The San Francisco School in 1975, I’m still figuring out how to do a
better job cultivating the “intellectual, imaginative and humanitarian promise”
(part of our mission statement) of each and every child. And so are my fellow
teachers at the school. Always a work in progress.
I think part of what makes such ventures
successful is a healthy distrust of what normally constitutes success in a student
and/or success in a school. Often the criteria is measured in right answers on
tests and good behavior in the students. I believe in both—but only up to a
point. I’m as much (if not more) interested in vibrant questions not easily
answered (or ever answerable) in tests and behavior that reveals the deep
character and the soulful needs of the child. Schools prefer the desks in rows,
the margins aligned, the neat and orderly lines of children walking quietly in
the halls, but some of the best moments in my classes come in exuberant
outbursts of choreographed chaos.
I recently was asked to fill out a questionnaire
from a therapist working with one of my students. This was a boy I actually
kicked out of class the first day of school, so yes, he needed some support and
attention. His behavior at times was making everyone miserable, including
himself and the therapist and the test were one of the ways we listened to his
call, knowing that “behavior is the language of children” and we had to de-code
what he was trying to tell us. (And FYI, he made some impressive turnarounds and that's happy for everyone.)
But reading through the test that was attempting to corral his wild impulses into a graphable profile, I just had to laugh.
Below are 10 out of 28 questions and be honest, how many of these apply to you on any given day?
And how many applied to Einstein, John Lennon, Louis Armstrong, Steve Jobs,
Paula Poundstone and host of other crazy geniuses who couldn’t walk between the
narrow lines set out by schools? If we are truly to meet the needs of children,
holding them to the standards of civil group behavior is essential, but not
enough. We need to dig deeper and find ways to affirm their wild, restless,
distractable, defiant, excitable selves, find the right containers—like music,
art, drama, for example—and pay them some courtesy.
Here’s the test. Not much room for “exuberant
outbursts of choreographed chaos.” How do you measure up?
CONNERS’
TEACHING RATING SCALE Mark: Never/
Sometimes/ Often/ Always
1.
Easily
distracted
2.
Defiant
3.
Restless,
always on the go
4.
Forgets
things he/she has learned
5.
Argues
with adults
6.
Only
pays attention to things he/she is interested in
7.
Lacks
interest in schoolwork
8.
Poor
in arithmetic
9.
Fails
to finish things he/she starts
10. Excitable
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.