“No children should
ever have to feel like their teachers don’t like them—even if they don’t!” (From an interview with a hiring committee at
my school.)
I love this. I was in a discussion group yesterday dreaming
about a “magic wand” change each of us would like to make in the world. Mine
was to re-organize all of education with one purpose only— to help children
feel known, wanted, valued, important, to bless them with earned praise when
they come up with an interesting idea or make a breakthrough or do something
with particular finesse and the whole force of their character. What a
difference that would make! A world of children growing into adults who feel
that they belong, that they are needed, that they are worthy of notice from adults.
How could such children habitually harm others if they themselves felt loved
and appreciated?
I also love the last part of the sentence—“even if they don’t!” That gives a reality check to
the fantasy of unconditional love for all, the brute truth that some
chemistries don’t mix well, some qualities of kids (and adults!) we will find
annoying, unpleasant or downright maddening. Yes, we can and must address those
things that muddy the class flow, bother classmates, disrupt the harmony. But
it’s always a good idea—though not easy— to separate behavior from people. “I
don’t like what you just did” is quite different from “I don’t like you!” and teachers should mind the
difference.
I just finished a remarkable book titled A House in Bali
by Colin McPhee. The author was a composer who went to Bali in the 1930’s and
was one of the first to transcribe and record Balinese music and make it more
known in the West. In one chapter, he talks about a boy who he was helping
learn to read and write and his alarm when the boy wanted to go the local
school (p. 178 for those interested). He writes:
I dreaded the schools
and the Indonesian teachers, with their hatred for the past and their
determination to stamp out all traces of native culture. I had often looked in
a doorway, drawn by the droning chant of lessons which were suddenly broken
into from time to time by shrill cries of fury from the teacher. …with his
switch.
Physical punishment
was something new for the pupils, for at home they were rarely chastised. They
grew up in freedom, seldom giving any trouble, for at the age of four a boy was
already a ‘small man,’ with a fine sense of his own responsibility in herding
ducks or taking the great water buffaloes to the stream each day for their
bath. At home the children would mimic the teacher with that peculiar gift of
the Balinese for cutting satire. They would have the family in fits of laughter
as they reproduced the sharp, dry, perpetually furious voice, the quick raps of
his ruler against the side of the desk, and the way he was descent like the
wrath of Shiva, striking here and there and breathing hard in his excitement
(with) his shameless exhibition of rage, this frantic exposure of the frantic
inner self…
This scene, straight out of Dickens, is all too prevalent in
schools worldwide, still today (though hopefully less than in 1938). Graced
with a different narrative of child-raising at home— a combination of
useful work and permission to run free and fly kites and such—the kids could
see this imported Western model of schooling for the weird thing it is,
wrathful teachers losing any sense of dignity and equanimity and exposing their
own eroded spirit. And as for any hope that the teacher “likes” the children,
well, hard to feel that with furious voice, rapping ruler or twitching switch
in hand. The only lesson learned at that school is cruelty.
My colleagues, we’re a long way from switch in hand, but
still there are many verbal and gestural ways to draw blood from innocent and
not-so-innocent young people. We would all do well to pause and ask ourselves, “Does
each one of my students feel that I like him or her? If not, why not? “ And if
you’re really brave, you can even ask them! Wouldn’t that be interesting?