Back in the “good ole days” at my school, administration consisted of Terry and Lynne. Technically the school Head and Assistant Head, but for us faculty, it was Terry and Lynne. And Susan, the parent volunteer at the front desk. Teachers ran the staff meetings—brought snacks, decided the agenda, rotated chairing. We checked in about delightful and less-delightful classes with the kids and/or encounters with the parents, dreamed forth a step-by-step organic growing of school curriculum, hiring a Spanish teacher, a P.E. teacher and such, gathered at Holiday times to take down the shelves and curtains in the huge elementary open classroom and put together a stage built by a parent that was stored behind the school so we could put on our annual Holiday plays.
Over the years, following the trend of the times and the slightly enlarged student body, administration grew one person at a time— a Development Director, a Finance person, a Middle School head, etc. But once that was set in motion, it seemed to keep proliferating and without staff input. As one teacher put it, every time someone in Admin broke a fingernail, they hired a new person. Somewhere around 2005, I heard the first teacher talk about “us” (teachers) and “them” (administrators). Suddenly Terry and Lynne became some 25 “thems” in Admin and without so much as a by-your-leave. “They” set the meeting agendas, made decisions behind closed doors, paid themselves an hourly wage greater than “us” and took up offices and parking spots. Everyone shrugged their shoulders and just accepted, “It’s the way of the world.”
But is it? It’s certainly the way of the corporate world, but a school is not a business. It’s a communal vision in action. Of course, some of it is business and yes, I’d rather teach the kids than balance the books, so thanks to the finance person. But I sorely missed those collective staff meetings and it was clear that when you give someone a job title and an office, they have to figure out stuff to do all day long. My work never changed. Live, breathing children kept showing up at my door and I had to teach them. But if I sat in an office, I’d make up things to do and forms to fill out and listen to parents complain for three hours while the teacher they’re complaining about gets three minutes of my time before they’re off to yard duty. Rather than ease the burden of teaching, some of this new trend to over-administration actually ended up adding to the teacher’s burden.
I’m six years retired from the school, but now I feel the same dynamic happening in the national Orff Association. To their credit, after some mini-disasters of hiring outside guns who hadn’t taught music classes under the guise of being more “professional,” the organization still has a grass-roots quality, its Board and Committee members coming from still-working music teachers mostly volunteering their time.
But the committee mentality of “solving” issues better dealt with through simple conversations, reflection, reading and thinking, has infested the organization. Instead of being a group of like-minded teachers/ artists sitting around the table with the snacks they prepared sharing their passion for both teaching and art, it has become a Kafka nightmare. Take this e-mail I received recently suggesting I look at the following (AOSA stands for American Orff Schulwerk Association, but the first sign of over-bureaucracy is lots of initials that I mostly don't understand):
Please take a moment to review the following:
- AOSA Leadership Code of Conduct
- Handbook for Orff Schulwerk Teacher Education Courses- Updates
- Teacher Educator Additional Curricular Apprenticeship (TEACA)
- 2027 Basic Level II and III Pilot
- AOSA Logo on All Course Materials
- Updated Ambassador Materials
- Upcoming Levels Course Student Website Logins
- AOSA TE Website Directory
- Presenting a CTED/DOS/EOS Session
- AOSA Leadership Interest Forms
- DEIA Efforts
Each one alone might be worth some consideration and I don’t doubt the sincerity of the committee members in thinking they’re contributing to the evolution of the Orff vision. But put it all together and even Kafka would be surprised. It’s just too much and ends up not only being a burden, but a distraction, a fantasy that following some guidelines set by others and signing off with your compliance is actually going to effect needed change.
If I were running the Board meetings, I’d ask those present to share stories about recent classes with their kids and what delightful surprises came up. To share the most memorable Orff workshop they attended and talk about what made it memorable. To share the most memorable Orff workshop they taught. To talk about what was going on for them artistically or share a concert/ museum exhibit/ play they’ve seen recently that moved them. To talk about what they’re reading and how it opened their mind and heart. You get the idea.
And then get down to "business." That's always going to be part of putting feet to the vision. But by beginning with the above, it might remind the group of what they’re actually here for, which goes far, far beyond reporting about the new committee formed or form to fill out.
This post is probably the wrong place to express my discontent (though perhaps some Orff teachers are reading it?), but the trends and the distractions from renewing your group’s purpose are happening everywhere. Take from it what you will. Or better yet, fill out the survey and form I will send to your e-mail/ text message/ WhatsApp/ Facebook message.
Also let me know if you'd like to join the Committee that will discuss if we have too many Committees. Have fun!
