To continue the story theme.
According to the smiles of the kids I
teach, the testimony of the kids I have taught, the reflections of the teachers
I train, I’m a reasonably good teacher. More and more I see that though it has
something to do with all the hours I’ve put in learning and practicing the
details of my craft— no skipping that step—it mostly has to do with the
story I’ve cultivated about what music is, what teaching means, what children
are, what people are—or could be if given permission to be wholly themselves. Without
that background story, none of the clever techniques and brilliant class plans
can wholly come to fruition. This is the missing piece of Orff training and
time and again, I see the failure of young (or old) teachers merely copying the
surface of the approach without fundamentally changing their notions of
teaching, children and music.
I wrote an article years back titled “Teaching as
We Have Not Been Taught” and suggested that it’s extremely difficult to teach
in a way that was not modeled for us when we were children in school. Whether we
loved or hated school, were wildly successful or dismal failures, whether we
were stimulated or bored, doesn’t matter—the model itself seeped into our
psyche and became the blueprint for all our notions about what school and
education is. We may take the radical step of deep questioning and try to turn
around the limiting ideas and follow the inspired ones, but that model lurks in
the background like a magnet ready to pull us back at any moment. It takes
great energy, great courage, deep thinking and despite our best intentions,
there is always the danger of falling back into our default setting. At the end
of the matter, to truly shake off the yoke of ineffective and uninspired
education, we need to change the background story that drives education.
Here are some of the bad ideas I encountered
growing up about music and children that shaped my first notions and fed my
resistance to them:
About
Music:
• Not everyone is
musical. It’s a special talent reserved for some.
• Music is the notes on
the paper that direct your fingers to follow their instruction. You learn music
through the eye and the fingers.
• Music means playing an
instrument.
• Music is sound only
divorced from dance, drama and story.
• Music means playing
other’s pieces.
• Music—and books titled
“The History of Music”— are about the Bach, Beethoven and the boys.
• Music is a chore to
learn involving scales and long hours of practicing alone. It requires doing
unmusical things before arriving at music itself.
• Music is an optional
specialized subject primarily useful as entertainment.
Along comes Orff Schulwerk, jazz and world music into
my life to turn those notions upside down and inside out.
• Everyone is musical. Without exception.
But they need certain kinds of experiences to release, nurture, cultivate and
refine their innate musicality.
• Music is in the air, in the body, in the voice,
in the mind, freely available without formal study or deciphering black dots on
paper. You learn music through the ear, the voice and the whole body.
• To be musical is to find musical potential in
every object. To be a professional musician will require choosing one or two
instruments as a primary expressive voice, but music is much more than simply
playing an instrument.
• Music is joined at the hip with dance, drama
and story and loses it full power when divorced from them.
• Music at its height and depth is a creative art
form, brought to life through improvisation, composition, interpretation.
• Music is infinitely larger than Western Europe
between 1600 and 1900. Books titled “The History of Music” would require at
least one volume for every ethnic group that has ever lived on the planet.
• Music is primarily learned by the communal act of
making music with joyful participation.
• Music is as essential as bread, as necessary as
water, to our emotional life and our community life, a staple of the main
course of daily life and not an optional dessert.
Deeply understanding the above story informs every
choice I make about how to teach music to children. But to teach music
to children, I need to question other assumptions:
About
Children
• Children are lazy and
need punishments and rewards to motivate them.
• Children are wild and
unruly and need punishments and rewards to tame them, make them perform
properly and obey the teacher.
• Children need to be
made to sit still.
• Children have short
attention spans and many of them have a disease called ADD.
• Children are to be
judged, sorted, labeled according to talent and intelligence.
After 40 years of hanging out with kids, I’ve
created my own assumptions about them that help them rise to my image of their
potential
• Children are motivated from within to master
worthy things. In the case of music, the combination of technical challenges,
beautiful sound and stirring group music-making are enough (when artfully
presented) to keep children on task. Rather than treat the learning of music as
an economic transaction (“Do this and you get a sticker. Do this or else I’m
sending you out in the hall.”), the innate pleasure of music-making is at the
center of each class.
• Children have an infectious, dynamic energy that
needs to be focused into artful expression. When their wildness comes into
coherent form in a soothing or boisterous song, a crazy drama skit, a
thunderous drumming, their scattered energy is focused in just the right way,
finds the proper channel for its expression.
• Children need to move. Often and best with
focused energy— as in dance. So do adults.
• ADD is not a physiologically-originated nervous
disorder, but a reflection of the culture we have given them and/or our
misreading of children’s natural energy. In the former case, remotes, cell
phones, instant entertainment have created a hyper-distracted culture where
everything is interruptable and requires greater volume, violence, sex and
other lower-brain attractors to capture our attention. In the latter, we expect
too much when we ask children to sit for long periods listening to or doing
boring things. I’ve had 60 minute classes with 5-year olds that flow with their
full attention. I can create a pin-drop silence for an hour or more with
children of all ages when I tell a story.
• Children are to be cared for, valued, understood
at each stage of development, known and appreciated for their emerging
character, nurtured, held, touched and loved. Their particular blend of talent
and intelligence should be carefully observed and helped along (as well as
their particular challenges in the multiplicity of intelligences) so they learn
not to compete with their classmates, but to celebrate with them each one’s way
to contribute to the world.
The combination of the stories I carry about what
music is and who children are account for any success I’ve had as a music
teacher. So in training our future teachers, along with the details of the
craft, can we spend some time examining these deeper stories about what we
think our subject matter is, what we think children are, what we think it means
to teach children our subject is?
Think about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.